T he media magazine Zapp is already disavowed almost like to order itself in its most recent shipment is reported in his usual upbeat been made under "Durchgezappt" again about what happened in the media world else. This time, it informed its shrinking viewership among the crisp headline "The sacking of the week" about which the scandal on 30.01.2008 in the show "Nightloft" the station had happened Pro7. Namely, there was the presenter Juliane Ziegler expressed the following sentence: "Arbeit Macht Frei."
Quite rightly, she was criticized from many sides. Who is not clear that this is an extremely negative connotation statement is because the National Socialists that original title of a novel by Lorenz Diefenbach in 1872 in a cynical and inhuman way abused for their perverse purposes and at the gates of several concentration and extermination camps were attached, has lost nothing in the pure television.
This is evident in so Zapp and praises God for that Ziegler was terminated because of "your moderator job is going [...] thank God." 1 . Add this introduction, we explained to the audience, first on the fact that "the rules of television entertainment is not so difficult" were. To prove you summarize this in a handy mnemonic: "You can almost everything, only from Hitler's Germany as far as possible you should stay away." This had not yet got round always right, knows Zapp. Zapp is right where it is right. In order to find evidence for this theory, however, Zapp does not even switch on Pro7. Why look in the distance, when the fallibility lies so near? It is enough to just look at your program and the broadcast of 11.07.2007 Zapp cause to heart. There Zapp Promulgated under the heading "Durchgezappt" the following sentence: "To each his own."
To paraphrase Zapp: "There was some games." Yes, but what? Zapp will not even live broadcast and has also let a whole week to go to his head by the wording carefully. One would think that seven days was sufficient to arrive at what is going on with this set up. It's bad enough when one does not know from the outset. It was on this site Even then pointed out that probably can be assumed that Zapp with this formulation is not more to the Latin original version "suum cuique" referred. This would otherwise like a foreign body in apparently to "image" or RTL explosive style similar style of "Durchgezappt".
So while Zapp world paternally pointing out that "the rules are not in television entertainment so hard" are, it is self evidently not very familiar with it and in practice are hopelessly overburdened and quoted so as casually unmoved as the entrance of the extermination camp of Buchenwald been forged inscription: "To each his own."
This sentence is now already for more than half a year remains on the site of NDR Zapp [→] . It therefore seems a bit absurd that Zapp stands on Pro7. Pro7 and the production company 9Live can benefit rather keep that one immediately responded. Juliane Ziegler was temporarily taken immediately from the live broadcast to them, after they had apparently been informed about the problems of their testimony, re-engage in the transmission event, so she dissociate herself from her statement, which she did immediately. Your statement is nevertheless justified by nothing and unsustainable. That they are therefore dismissed, is a good signal, and makes 9Live least in this respect rather than sympathetic unsympathetic, but this of course was not the tenor of the Zapp contribution. Where would we be too, if you have a good hair could be on the private television? It's much more convenient to just always hew to the same line, to indulge in stereotypes, and these Dünnbrettbohrerei of the oh-so-revered fee payers still have to honor.
Zapp has actually been no statement distancing heard, let alone that one about the collaboration with Geeta Datta, who had completed employee responsible for this story. God forbid! Why also, apparently for Zapp are different, and their own strange rules. Geeta Datta may work for Zapp blithely 2 , Zapp is blind in one eye and overheated about God and the world, while still "To each his own" emblazoned on its website. 3 
In the 9Live for Pro7 produced quiz show "Nightloft" was apparently so at least one senior editor or manager, who had the necessary historical and linguistic sensitivity, even to intervene in the same consignment. Kuno Haberbusch, editor and "King of Search" by Zapp seemed to "each his own" do not disturb obviously, any more than anyone else in the Zapp-editors, who had said how all the time in the world to this formulation to . prevent What went wrong with the research? Was the internet connection was cut off or the phone Joker already used up?
It has been elsewhere pointed out that Geeta Datta, after having written a thesis on the "fragmentary world of German television news," should dedicate with all due respect, maybe next they may be fragmentary education.
The other is to pose as stupid, a few masters of Zapp's disciplines. Although it is made in this article do not bother trying it Zapp to do in this respect equal to his immodest enough, to hold up a mirror, you have to admit simply recognizing Zapp in this matter, to how rich in all the others, not the water. In the course of exercising this discipline anyway Zapp Maik Gizinski employees informed in connection with Ziegler's unacceptable verbal blunder that had "self" Ziegler "blonde colleague," a funny look. So then it must indeed be right stupid, even if the blonde looks funny! Zapp leaves, it seems, in terms of stereotypes, and these were still burning so flat, just nothing, just like on the football field, Mr. Gizinski. It also seems to be a little bumpier apology to Ms. Ziegler delektieren, which of course sends you again: "[...] these are the live moments, these spontaneous, something where rausflutscht just what you've picked up somewhere even know what simply a mistake. . Sorry "to them once again to quote his own words:" Although it only because anything is rausgeflutscht what they picked up somewhere [...]". That's how Mrs. Ziegler is to make matters worse, even as a little silly that something somewhere has "snapped", which you then "rausflutscht". Mr. Gizinski, would you describe your colleague Geeta Datta for their "To each his own" pose so condescending in your mission as silly?
One can only wonder whether Zapp sometime the same scale in itself creates, at which it measures its environment. Before one other home lights, one should perhaps re-examine whether the fact that one is blind in one eye, perhaps is so in the context that it is a huge bar to which you think more should be considered by the splitter in the eyes of others. To avoid being disappointed, put it on his hopes for inspection at Zapp at zero. Better than the above example can illustrate almost any case double standards. Or, to be talking a nice Anglicism: self-righteousness at its best! And because it was so beautiful, just another Anglicism: equality and justice are obviously at Zapp only on-demand goods.
Since it's almost back to determine reassuring that the Zapp viewers are exposed less obvious than you might think at Zapp, yes, that they need Zapp as a guide in the media landscape and do not vote with the remote. As indicated above, obviously not just holding a small number of spectators Zapp not loyal. On 11.07.2007 would still 130,000 spectators turned Zapp, be it last Wednesday was only 90,000, which represented a market share of 3.1% and silly means losing over 25%. 4 Given this small audience, you should not turn overly upset about Zapp. Zapp much crop damage can not reach anyway with such a cause in the media landscape. Imagine only that the later had NDR program "Planet Earth" in the repetition of night time, namely by 1.59 clock, with 3.4% greater market share. Of course this is only partially comparable, but the number is 90 000 really shockingly low and speaks for itself.
Now it is in itself a great advantage of public service broadcasting and television, that guided program design not only of audiences can be, but certain sectors at low viewing figures continue to maintain, as the example of Phoenix shows that Moreover, greater success than originally expected, is it still with a market share of around 1% in the private NTV and N24. 5 Now Phoenix is beyond reproach, and it is regarded as an achievement that the Federal Republic of the population these divisions and level of luxury theater channel, documentary channel, information channel, 3sat arte receives as well as regional programs. But not every branch has level. And where there is a lack of level, one may even wonder why you should finance such things as license fee payers. That question arises in a number of broadcasts on ARD and ZDF, and now slowly at Zapp. Approach and ambition are still good, why was it necessary to go down to the level of those who are constantly criticized to some extent right? A magazine media is important, but the director of the NDR is not here please make bucks to gardeners in the garden or media can not continue the bucks gardening Sun
Small suggestion in the end: Now, is there Juliane Ziegler unemployed, they may perhaps present the next "Durchgezappt".
Only valiantly keep it up! Many greetings to Bert from the Prize-Donnepp probably still tipsy six historians and linguists from Zapp.
PS:
Irritating way seems the NDR does not even have to know how the price one has garnered, is written correctly is to read too for several days, a press release with the following headline: "Media Magazine, Zapp receives' Bert Donepp Prize." Twice in a row there is the price to which you are so proud, false, namely with one, rather than written with two "n". Well, probably taps the blonde on the press releases, which, Mr. Gizinski? Zapp, media magazine, NDR, Kuno Haberbusch, Kuno, Haberbusch, Nicola von Hollander, Julia Stone, Bert Donnepp Price, Bert Donepp price Donnepp, Juliane Ziegler, 9Live , Pro7, Nightloft, Geeta Datta, Datta, Gita, Maik Gizinski, Gizinski, each his own, Arbeit Macht Frei, concentration camp, concentration camp
© Stefan Fix, 2008
Post a Comment