D o this site on time is too valuable to them with reports on the NDR magazine Zapp and his sometimes verquast-style reporting in the "case" to clog Senait Mehari and here, preferring again to be of Erquicklicherem the speech was now a source blog put into the grid, which is solely dedicated to the theme of "child soldiers in Eritrea"
http://textquellenzueritrea.wordpress.com/
There may also be the last Zapp employee and the last "eyewitness" convinced of the fact that there were child soldiers in Eritrea. This is demonstrated not by shady and sinister characters, or about "commercial media" and certainly not bent on its image, the modern media company serving charities , but mainly from a friend of Julia balances taken as expert Günter Schröder, the scientist Hartmut Quehl viz.
So why this blog has been posted online source, where the journalist but for pop music, Peter Disch, who kicked off the whole debate around Mehari have never denied that there were child soldiers in Eritrea? This is actually explained in the section "concerns" of the source blogs linked above clearly, but only after several paragraphs, so you have to wade through until then. Therefore, the explanation here again divided earlier and reader-friendly.
The sources, which prove the general existence of child soldiers in Eritrea were placed online for the following reasons:
First
because the TV magazine Zapp on 14/02/2008 Mehreteab Abraham, the spokesman for the Mehari's critics showed, as he chanted in front of the Berlinale Palast, loud and clear:
"There is no so-called child soldiers in Eritrea."
This is of concern because both use Julia balances regularly and Peter Disch Mehreteab Abraham as a witness for their pure Meharis detailed critique of representation of a single camp in Eritrea. Why then not call the witness ". There was no so-called child soldiers in the Tsebah-school", but if it only go to this one school?
Second
Julia also balances because this false, totally generalized statement of a witness not commented on her, let alone that they are distanced about it.
Third
because Julia balances rather seamlessly joined because their own statement:
"In the movie there are child soldiers in Eritrea. He plays the early eighties. The ten-year Avet comes to the Eritrean rebels. There she is trained as a soldier. A feature film - in fact fictional, but the producers say [...] We are very close to the truth. This is a true story. '"
This type of co-cutting the unchallenged left, false claim of one of their witnesses insinuates her own statement, balance that there were no child soldiers in Eritrea and moved the debate very even on the general level to which you - as seconded Peter Disch their resistance - allegedly did not go.
4th
weil Julia Salden in ebendiesem Beitrag an späterer Stelle Folgendes sagte:
"Nevertheless, the film is strongly reminiscent of the book. Children will learn weapons, shoot and kill. [...] Has it really existed in Eritrea? "
Why is Julia balances that question, if they - did not deny the existence of child soldiers in Eritrea - according to Peter Disch? Wenn es Julia Salden zudem doch gar nicht um Eritrea, sondern nur um eine Schule gehe, warum fragt sie dann nicht: „Hat es das an der Tsebah-Schule wirklich gegeben?” Diese Frage stellt Julia Salden womöglich deshalb nicht, weil es in dem Film überhaupt nicht um die Tsebah-Schule geht.
5th
because Julia balances in the context of child soldiers in Eritrea of "allegedly historical [n] truths" spoke.
6th
because of the Zapp and Disch always relied on "witnesses" on its website a "welcome message" published , in the general expressis is explicitly the existence of child soldiers in Eritrea in the past and present denied:
"In Eritrea, there was never child soldiers, to date there is not."
Due to the fact that this message without comment and was released without any distancing, must be assumed that as a "GbR witnesses Tsebah-school" operating under the name "witnesses" in the "greeting" view expressed, according to which it may never child soldiers in Eritrea have to share in full.
In this "greeting" is also at any single point of the "Tsebah-school" the speech at issue but reportedly only. On the contrary, the originator of the message is expressed at the beginning but that she could not judge what is true of Meharis history. Instead, it negates the existence of a flat rate of child soldiers in Eritrea. This solidarity will now address provided by the "witnesses" without any comment online. Dancing since the "witnesses" from the series about?
Disch's statement, according to him, basically just going to Almaz Yohannes who felt defamed in Mehari book and the fact that the "Tsebah-school" was a mere school, without a military character. Worum aber geht es den „Zeitzeugen”, mit denen sich Disch umgibt? Apparently a considerable contribution to Eritrea in general. This general discussion Disch complains but only at his critics, not with his witnesses. Had also a person as the originator of the "greeting" dared to speak in favor of Mehari, while simultaneously Eingeständis that she could not judge what is true of Mehari story is, would Mr. Disch her long an instructive entry into his fiery heart body dedicated to where he had explained to the person on line and thread, that they only "ventiliere", "in appearances" take and in general terms and discuss, in short, the discussion did not lost anything and have it do not worth that one ever eingehe on them.
This is essentially contradictory statements by Peter Disch, Julia and Abraham Mehreteab balances regarding the existence of child soldiers in Eritrea were also the occasion to put the sources online.
At this point, once again allowed the deputy head of the group program abroad are cited in the West German Radio, Arnd Henze, even if Mr. Disch complains that the criticism is already a year old. But now, the Disch has again changed his mind and informed his fellow man, that it does not matter how old a word, but that it depended on the quality of the text. Faced with such wisdom, remains an almost open mouthed. Anyway, now that Mr. Henze had a different view had not yet read. also has its critics neither its topicality nor lost any relevance or significance:
Geht es darum, das Selbstbild vom legitimen Befreiungskampf nicht durch das Eingeständnis völkerrechtswidriger Kriegsmethoden zu relativieren [...] Hat sich Zapp möglicherweise für einen zynischen Geschichts-Revisionismus einspannen lassen?
More>